sharkdp/hyperfine vs ultraworkers/claw-code
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, hyperfine and claw-code both show healthy maintenance signals. hyperfine last saw a commit 1 month ago with 27+ active contributors, while claw-code was committed to 1 day ago with 10+ active contributors. hyperfine is Apache-2.0-licensed while claw-code is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
sharkdp/hyperfine →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓27+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 39% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ultraworkers/claw-code →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 71% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hyperfine | claw-code | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 28,054 | 194,369 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 78 | 20 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 14% | 17% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? sharkdp/hyperfine · ultraworkers/claw-code
Ask AI about sharkdp/hyperfine vs ultraworkers/claw-code
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.