signalapp/signal-server vs yunaiv/yudao-cloud
signalapp/signal-server shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, signal-server shows healthier maintenance signals than yudao-cloud. signal-server rates Healthy overall while yudao-cloud rates Mixed. signal-server was committed to 3 weeks ago with 8+ active contributors, while yudao-cloud was committed to 1 week ago with 2+ active contributors. signal-server is AGPL-3.0-licensed while yudao-cloud is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
signalapp/signal-server
Strong maintenance signals
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
yunaiv/yudao-cloud
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 98% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| signal-server | yudao-cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 10,683 | 19,486 |
| Last commit | 22d ago | 13d ago |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 1 | 1 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 45% | 21% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? signalapp/signal-server · yunaiv/yudao-cloud
Ask AI about signalapp/signal-server vs yunaiv/yudao-cloud
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.