significant-gravitas/autogpt vs tencentarc/gfpgan
significant-gravitas/autogpt shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, autogpt shows healthier maintenance signals than gfpgan. autogpt rates Healthy overall while gfpgan rates Mixed. autogpt was committed to today with 16+ active contributors, while gfpgan last saw a commit 1 year ago with 11+ active contributors. Both use the Other license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
significant-gravitas/autogpt →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 17% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
tencentarc/gfpgan →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| autogpt | gfpgan | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 185,180 | 37,447 |
| Last commit | today | 1y ago |
| License | Other | Other |
| Open issues | 449 | 403 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 2% | 85% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? significant-gravitas/autogpt · tencentarc/gfpgan
Ask AI about significant-gravitas/autogpt vs tencentarc/gfpgan
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.