sindresorhus/get-port vs vercel/pkg
vercel/pkg shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, pkg shows healthier maintenance signals than get-port. pkg rates Healthy overall while get-port rates Mixed. get-port last saw a commit 3 months ago with 21+ active contributors, while pkg last saw a commit 2 years ago with 26+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
sindresorhus/get-port →
OpenSSF Scorecard says this is unmaintained
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 69% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (2/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 8w ago
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
vercel/pkg →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 31% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| get-port | pkg | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 923 | 24,379 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | 2y ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 1 | 0 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 33% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? sindresorhus/get-port · vercel/pkg
Ask AI about sindresorhus/get-port vs vercel/pkg
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.