sjmoran/low-light-video-enhancement vs tiangolo/fastapi
tiangolo/fastapi shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, fastapi shows healthier maintenance signals than low-light-video-enhancement. fastapi rates Healthy overall while low-light-video-enhancement rates Mixed. low-light-video-enhancement last saw a commit 4 years ago with 2+ active contributors, while fastapi was committed to today with 5+ active contributors. low-light-video-enhancement is Other-licensed while fastapi is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
sjmoran/low-light-video-enhancement →
Stale — last commit 5y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 5y ago…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 5y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 5y ago
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms; 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
tiangolo/fastapi →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 48% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| low-light-video-enhancement | fastapi | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 34 | 99,696 |
| Last commit | 4y ago | today |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 0 | 100 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? sjmoran/low-light-video-enhancement · tiangolo/fastapi
Ask AI about sjmoran/low-light-video-enhancement vs tiangolo/fastapi
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.