sjmoran/satire-classifier vs vinta/awesome-python
vinta/awesome-python shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, awesome-python shows stronger maintenance signals than satire-classifier. awesome-python rates Mixed overall while satire-classifier rates Concerns. satire-classifier last saw a commit 3 years ago with 2+ active contributors, while awesome-python was committed to 3 days ago with 26+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
sjmoran/satire-classifier →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 3y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 3y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 3y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 67% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
vinta/awesome-python →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 60% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| satire-classifier | awesome-python | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 1 | 304,706 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 3d ago |
| License | — | Other |
| Open issues | 4 | 19 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? sjmoran/satire-classifier · vinta/awesome-python
Ask AI about sjmoran/satire-classifier vs vinta/awesome-python
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.