sjmoran/yc-ai-cohort-analysis vs vinta/awesome-python
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, yc-ai-cohort-analysis and awesome-python both show mixed maintenance signals. yc-ai-cohort-analysis last saw a commit 2 months ago with 1+ active contributor, while awesome-python was committed to 1 week ago with 25+ active contributors. yc-ai-cohort-analysis is MIT-licensed while awesome-python is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
sjmoran/yc-ai-cohort-analysis →
Solo project — review before adopting
single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible); no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: onboard a second core maintainer; add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
vinta/awesome-python →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 6d ago
- ✓25+ active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| yc-ai-cohort-analysis | awesome-python | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 0 | 303,480 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 8d ago |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 0 | 18 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? sjmoran/yc-ai-cohort-analysis · vinta/awesome-python
Ask AI about sjmoran/yc-ai-cohort-analysis vs vinta/awesome-python
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.