sjmoran/yc-ai-cohort-analysis vs vinta/awesome-python
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, yc-ai-cohort-analysis and awesome-python both show mixed maintenance signals. yc-ai-cohort-analysis last saw a commit 5 months ago with 1+ active contributor, while awesome-python was committed to 1 day ago with 6+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
sjmoran/yc-ai-cohort-analysis
Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible); no tests detected in the complete Git tree…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: onboard a second core maintainer; add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
vinta/awesome-python
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 93% of recent commits; license evidence incomplete…
license evidence incomplete
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
license evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| yc-ai-cohort-analysis | awesome-python | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 0 | 321,135 |
| Last commit | 5mo ago | 1d ago |
| License | MIT | Unknown |
| Open issues | 0 | 19 |
| Has tests | No | ✓ |
| Has CI | No | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 43% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? sjmoran/yc-ai-cohort-analysis · vinta/awesome-python
Ask AI about sjmoran/yc-ai-cohort-analysis vs vinta/awesome-python
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.