spacedriveapp/spacedrive vs tummychow/git-absorb
tummychow/git-absorb shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, git-absorb shows healthier maintenance signals than spacedrive. git-absorb rates Healthy overall while spacedrive rates Mixed. spacedrive last saw a commit 2 months ago with 2+ active contributors, while git-absorb last saw a commit 4 months ago with 10+ active contributors. spacedrive is Other-licensed while git-absorb is BSD-3-Clause-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
spacedriveapp/spacedrive →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other); no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 68% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
tummychow/git-absorb →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| spacedrive | git-absorb | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 37,965 | 5,539 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 4mo ago |
| License | Other | BSD-3-Clause |
| Open issues | 32 | 25 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 83% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? spacedriveapp/spacedrive · tummychow/git-absorb
Ask AI about spacedriveapp/spacedrive vs tummychow/git-absorb
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.