spf13/cobra vs yeasy/blockchain_guide
spf13/cobra shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, cobra shows healthier maintenance signals than blockchain_guide. cobra rates Healthy overall while blockchain_guide rates Mixed. cobra last saw a commit 2 months ago with 51+ active contributors, while blockchain_guide last saw a commit 1 month ago with 3+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
spf13/cobra →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓51+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 11% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
yeasy/blockchain_guide →
Missing license — unclear to depend on
no license — legally unclear; top contributor handles 90% of recent commits…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| cobra | blockchain_guide | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 43,893 | 7,067 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Open issues | 363 | 1 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 3% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? spf13/cobra · yeasy/blockchain_guide
Ask AI about spf13/cobra vs yeasy/blockchain_guide
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.