spring-cloud/spring-cloud-gateway vs yunaiv/yudao-cloud
spring-cloud/spring-cloud-gateway shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, spring-cloud-gateway shows healthier maintenance signals than yudao-cloud. spring-cloud-gateway rates Healthy overall while yudao-cloud rates Mixed. spring-cloud-gateway was committed to 1 week ago with 11+ active contributors, while yudao-cloud was committed to 1 week ago with 2+ active contributors. spring-cloud-gateway is Apache-2.0-licensed while yudao-cloud is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
spring-cloud/spring-cloud-gateway
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10…
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 37% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
yunaiv/yudao-cloud
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 98% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| spring-cloud-gateway | yudao-cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,905 | 19,486 |
| Last commit | 11d ago | 11d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 544 | 1 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 91% | 21% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? spring-cloud/spring-cloud-gateway · yunaiv/yudao-cloud
Ask AI about spring-cloud/spring-cloud-gateway vs yunaiv/yudao-cloud
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.