squidfunk/mkdocs-material vs tiangolo/fastapi
tiangolo/fastapi shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, fastapi shows healthier maintenance signals than mkdocs-material. fastapi rates Healthy overall while mkdocs-material rates Mixed. mkdocs-material was committed to 2 weeks ago with 13+ active contributors, while fastapi last saw a commit 2 months ago with 5+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
squidfunk/mkdocs-material
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 80% of recent commits
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
tiangolo/fastapi
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ✓In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 48% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mkdocs-material | fastapi | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 27,342 | 99,696 |
| Last commit | 20d ago | 2mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 1 | 100 |
| Has tests | No | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? squidfunk/mkdocs-material · tiangolo/fastapi
Ask AI about squidfunk/mkdocs-material vs tiangolo/fastapi
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.