sshnet/ssh.net vs unity-technologies/ml-agents
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, ssh.net and ml-agents both show healthy maintenance signals. ssh.net last saw a commit 1 month ago with 16+ active contributors, while ml-agents last saw a commit 1 month ago with 27+ active contributors. ssh.net is MIT-licensed while ml-agents is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
sshnet/ssh.net →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 44% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
unity-technologies/ml-agents →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓27+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 30% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ssh.net | ml-agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,334 | 19,384 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 367 | 50 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 49% | 95% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? sshnet/ssh.net · unity-technologies/ml-agents
Ask AI about sshnet/ssh.net vs unity-technologies/ml-agents
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.