ssssssss-team/spider-flow vs yuliskov/smarttube
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, spider-flow and smarttube both show mixed maintenance signals. spider-flow last saw a commit 3 years ago with 15+ active contributors, while smarttube last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ssssssss-team/spider-flow →
Stale — last commit 3y ago
last commit was 3y ago; no tests detected…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 63% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
yuliskov/smarttube →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 97% of recent commits; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| spider-flow | smarttube | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 11,326 | 30,059 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 23 | 713 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ssssssss-team/spider-flow · yuliskov/smarttube
Ask AI about ssssssss-team/spider-flow vs yuliskov/smarttube
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.