stan-smith/fossflow vs tusen-ai/naive-ui
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
stan-smith/fossflow →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 38% of recent commits)
Show 3 more →Show less
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
tusen-ai/naive-ui →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 4d ago
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
Show 3 more →Show less
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| fossflow | naive-ui | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 20,158 | 18,288 |
| Last commit | 8d ago | 10d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 18 | 678 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 24% | 9% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? stan-smith/fossflow · tusen-ai/naive-ui
Ask AI about stan-smith/fossflow vs tusen-ai/naive-ui
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.