RepoPilot

stanfordnlp/corenlp vs tencent/tinker

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, corenlp and tinker both show mixed maintenance signals. corenlp last saw a commit 4 months ago with 3+ active contributors, while tinker last saw a commit 4 months ago with 4+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

stanfordnlp/corenlp

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 98% of recent commits…

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
  • GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 3 active contributors
  • GPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

tencent/tinker

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

MixedDependency

CI evidence incomplete; license evidence incomplete…

MixedFork & modify

CI evidence incomplete; license evidence incomplete

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

CI evidence incomplete; license evidence incomplete…

  • Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 52% of recent commits
  • Last commit 2w ago
  • 4 active contributors
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

corenlptinker
Stars10,07217,628
Last commit4mo ago4mo ago
LicenseGPL-3.0Unknown
Open issues182556
Has tests
Has CIUnknown
Test coverage33%15%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? stanfordnlp/corenlp · tencent/tinker

Ask AI about stanfordnlp/corenlp vs tencent/tinker

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.