RepoPilot

stanfordnlp/corenlp vs yunaiv/yudao-cloud

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, corenlp and yudao-cloud both show mixed maintenance signals. corenlp last saw a commit 4 months ago with 3+ active contributors, while yudao-cloud was committed to 1 week ago with 2+ active contributors. corenlp is GPL-3.0-licensed while yudao-cloud is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

stanfordnlp/corenlp

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 98% of recent commits…

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
  • GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 3 active contributors
  • GPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

yunaiv/yudao-cloud

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

MixedDependency

top contributor handles 98% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 3d ago
  • 2 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

corenlpyudao-cloud
Stars10,07219,486
Last commit4mo ago13d ago
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
Open issues1821
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage33%21%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeC
Cycles0
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? stanfordnlp/corenlp · yunaiv/yudao-cloud

Ask AI about stanfordnlp/corenlp vs yunaiv/yudao-cloud

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.