stonerl/thaw vs vuejs/vue
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, thaw and vue both show mixed maintenance signals. thaw was committed to 1 week ago with 4+ active contributors, while vue last saw a commit 1 year ago with 35+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
stonerl/thaw
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
no description (proxy for README missing); only 9 stars (< 100)
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 73% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
- •Fork & modify Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
- •Learn from Mixed to Healthy if: add a README + repo description
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
vuejs/vue
Stale — last commit 2y ago
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 57% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓35+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| thaw | vue | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9 | 212,464 |
| Last commit | 12d ago | 1y ago |
| License | Unknown | MIT |
| Open issues | 6 | 640 |
| Has tests | No | ✓ |
| Has CI | No | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | 74% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? stonerl/thaw · vuejs/vue
Ask AI about stonerl/thaw vs vuejs/vue
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.