supertokens/supertokens-core vs yuliskov/smarttube
supertokens/supertokens-core shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, supertokens-core shows healthier maintenance signals than smarttube. supertokens-core rates Healthy overall while smarttube rates Mixed. supertokens-core was committed to 1 week ago with 6+ active contributors, while smarttube was committed to 6 days ago with 8+ active contributors. supertokens-core is Apache-2.0-licensed while smarttube is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
supertokens/supertokens-core
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
yuliskov/smarttube
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| supertokens-core | smarttube | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 15,295 | 32,681 |
| Last commit | 10d ago | 6d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 142 | 698 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 92% | 28% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? supertokens/supertokens-core · yuliskov/smarttube
Ask AI about supertokens/supertokens-core vs yuliskov/smarttube
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.