tencent/qmui_android vs yuliskov/smarttube
yuliskov/smarttube shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, smarttube shows stronger maintenance signals than qmui_android. smarttube rates Mixed overall while qmui_android rates Concerns. qmui_android last saw a commit 1 year ago with 1+ active contributor, while smarttube last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors. qmui_android is Other-licensed while smarttube is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
tencent/qmui_android →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
yuliskov/smarttube →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 97% of recent commits; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| qmui_android | smarttube | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14,498 | 30,059 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 427 | 713 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 17% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? tencent/qmui_android · yuliskov/smarttube
Ask AI about tencent/qmui_android vs yuliskov/smarttube
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.