tencent/tinker vs tommylemon/android-zblibrary
tommylemon/android-zblibrary shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, android-zblibrary shows healthier maintenance signals than tinker. android-zblibrary rates Healthy overall while tinker rates Mixed. tinker last saw a commit 2 months ago with 4+ active contributors, while android-zblibrary last saw a commit 3 months ago with 9+ active contributors. tinker is Other-licensed while android-zblibrary is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
tencent/tinker →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other); no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 52% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
tommylemon/android-zblibrary →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 7w ago
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| tinker | android-zblibrary | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 17,628 | 5,605 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 3mo ago |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 556 | 12 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 15% | 4% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? tencent/tinker · tommylemon/android-zblibrary
Ask AI about tencent/tinker vs tommylemon/android-zblibrary
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.