tencentarc/gfpgan vs tiangolo/fastapi
tiangolo/fastapi shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, fastapi shows healthier maintenance signals than gfpgan. fastapi rates Healthy overall while gfpgan rates Mixed. gfpgan last saw a commit 1 year ago with 11+ active contributors, while fastapi was committed to today with 5+ active contributors. gfpgan is Other-licensed while fastapi is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
tencentarc/gfpgan →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
tiangolo/fastapi →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 48% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| gfpgan | fastapi | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 37,447 | 99,696 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | today |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 403 | 100 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 85% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? tencentarc/gfpgan · tiangolo/fastapi
Ask AI about tencentarc/gfpgan vs tiangolo/fastapi
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.