thirtydegreesray/openhub vs xkcoding/spring-boot-demo
xkcoding/spring-boot-demo shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, spring-boot-demo shows healthier maintenance signals than openhub. spring-boot-demo rates Healthy overall while openhub rates Mixed. openhub last saw a commit 2 years ago with 15+ active contributors, while spring-boot-demo last saw a commit 1 year ago with 9+ active contributors. openhub is GPL-3.0-licensed while spring-boot-demo is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
thirtydegreesray/openhub →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 2y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 72% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
xkcoding/spring-boot-demo →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 87% of recent commits
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| openhub | spring-boot-demo | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,348 | 34,102 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1y ago |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 247 | 142 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? thirtydegreesray/openhub · xkcoding/spring-boot-demo
Ask AI about thirtydegreesray/openhub vs xkcoding/spring-boot-demo
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.