thuml/time-series-library vs z4nzu/hackingtool
z4nzu/hackingtool shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, hackingtool shows healthier maintenance signals than time-series-library. hackingtool rates Healthy overall while time-series-library rates Mixed. time-series-library last saw a commit 2 months ago with 18+ active contributors, while hackingtool last saw a commit 3 months ago with 10+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
thuml/time-series-library →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
z4nzu/hackingtool →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 57% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 8w ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| time-series-library | hackingtool | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12,213 | 73,012 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 3mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 43 | 100 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 3% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? thuml/time-series-library · z4nzu/hackingtool
Ask AI about thuml/time-series-library vs z4nzu/hackingtool
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.