RepoPilot

tiangolo/fastapi vs z4nzu/hackingtool

Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, fastapi and hackingtool both show healthy maintenance signals. fastapi last saw a commit 2 months ago with 5+ active contributors, while hackingtool was committed to 3 weeks ago with 12+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

tiangolo/fastapi

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

MixedDependency

dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
  • Last commit today
  • 5 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 48% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

z4nzu/hackingtool

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 56% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 4d ago
  • 12 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

fastapihackingtool
Stars99,69679,138
Last commit2mo ago24d ago
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues100132
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage100%29%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeA
Cycles0
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? tiangolo/fastapi · z4nzu/hackingtool

Ask AI about tiangolo/fastapi vs z4nzu/hackingtool

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.