trekhleb/javascript-algorithms vs vercel/next.js
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, javascript-algorithms and next.js both show healthy maintenance signals. javascript-algorithms was committed to 1 week ago with 29+ active contributors, while next.js was committed to today with 24+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
trekhleb/javascript-algorithms →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 65% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (1/10)
- ✓Last commit 4d ago
- ✓29+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
vercel/next.js →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 14% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| javascript-algorithms | next.js | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 196,024 | 139,904 |
| Last commit | 12d ago | today |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 401 | 4,020 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 5% | 4% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? trekhleb/javascript-algorithms · vercel/next.js
Ask AI about trekhleb/javascript-algorithms vs vercel/next.js
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.