tronprotocol/java-tron vs yuliskov/smarttube
tronprotocol/java-tron shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, java-tron shows healthier maintenance signals than smarttube. java-tron rates Healthy overall while smarttube rates Mixed. java-tron last saw a commit 1 month ago with 19+ active contributors, while smarttube last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors. java-tron is LGPL-3.0-licensed while smarttube is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
tronprotocol/java-tron →
Healthy across the board
copyleft license (LGPL-3.0) — review compatibility
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠LGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 17% of recent commits)
- ✓LGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
yuliskov/smarttube →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 97% of recent commits; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| java-tron | smarttube | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,071 | 30,059 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 51 | 713 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 4% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? tronprotocol/java-tron · yuliskov/smarttube
Ask AI about tronprotocol/java-tron vs yuliskov/smarttube
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.