RepoPilot

tronprotocol/java-tron vs yunaiv/yudao-cloud

tronprotocol/java-tron shows stronger signals overall

As of September 2026, java-tron shows healthier maintenance signals than yudao-cloud. java-tron rates Healthy overall while yudao-cloud rates Mixed. java-tron was committed to 3 weeks ago with 14+ active contributors, while yudao-cloud was committed to 1 week ago with 2+ active contributors. java-tron is LGPL-3.0-licensed while yudao-cloud is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

tronprotocol/java-tron

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (LGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • LGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Last commit 5d ago
  • 14 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 25% of recent commits)
  • LGPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

yunaiv/yudao-cloud

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

MixedDependency

top contributor handles 98% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 3d ago
  • 2 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

java-tronyudao-cloud
Stars4,14819,486
Last commit23d ago13d ago
LicenseLGPL-3.0MIT
Open issues381
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage54%21%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeCC
Cycles00
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? tronprotocol/java-tron · yunaiv/yudao-cloud

Ask AI about tronprotocol/java-tron vs yunaiv/yudao-cloud

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.