trunk-rs/trunk vs ultraworkers/claw-code
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, trunk and claw-code both show healthy maintenance signals. trunk was committed to 3 weeks ago with 21+ active contributors, while claw-code last saw a commit 1 month ago with 11+ active contributors. trunk is Apache-2.0-licensed while claw-code is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
trunk-rs/trunk
Strong maintenance signals
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 8 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 36% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
ultraworkers/claw-code
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 65% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| trunk | claw-code | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,389 | 195,190 |
| Last commit | 21d ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 136 | 41 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 8% | 13% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | C | A |
| Cycles | 8 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? trunk-rs/trunk · ultraworkers/claw-code
Ask AI about trunk-rs/trunk vs ultraworkers/claw-code
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.