uber/nullaway vs yunaiv/yudao-cloud
uber/nullaway shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, nullaway shows healthier maintenance signals than yudao-cloud. nullaway rates Healthy overall while yudao-cloud rates Mixed. nullaway last saw a commit 4 months ago with 14+ active contributors, while yudao-cloud was committed to 1 week ago with 2+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
uber/nullaway
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 76% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
yunaiv/yudao-cloud
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 98% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| nullaway | yudao-cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,045 | 19,486 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 13d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 150 | 1 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 21% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? uber/nullaway · yunaiv/yudao-cloud
Ask AI about uber/nullaway vs yunaiv/yudao-cloud
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.