ultraworkers/claw-code vs wild-linker/wild
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, claw-code and wild both show healthy maintenance signals. claw-code was committed to 1 day ago with 10+ active contributors, while wild last saw a commit 1 month ago with 14+ active contributors. claw-code is MIT-licensed while wild is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ultraworkers/claw-code →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 71% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
wild-linker/wild →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 37% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| claw-code | wild | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 194,369 | 3,550 |
| Last commit | 1d ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 20 | 64 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 17% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? ultraworkers/claw-code · wild-linker/wild
Ask AI about ultraworkers/claw-code vs wild-linker/wild
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.