vercel/next.js vs withastro/astro
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
vercel/next.js →
Healthy across the board
weakest axisPermissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 19% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
withastro/astro →
Healthy across the board
weakest axisnon-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓35+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 26% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
What would change the summary?
- →Use as dependency Failing → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| next.js | astro | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 139,293 | 59,002 |
| Last commit | today | today |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 3,880 | 195 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 4% | 8% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? vercel/next.js · withastro/astro