RepoPilot

vitejs/vite vs vuejs/vue

vitejs/vite shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, vite shows healthier maintenance signals than vue. vite rates Healthy overall while vue rates Mixed. vite was committed to today with 35+ active contributors, while vue last saw a commit 1 year ago with 35+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

vitejs/vite

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Used by 3 trusted projects: nuxt/nuxt, withastro/astro, vitest-dev/vitest
  • Last commit today
  • 35+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 38% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

vuejs/vue

Mixed

Stale — last commit 2y ago

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…

  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 57% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • 35+ active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

vitevue
Stars81,683209,783
Last committoday1y ago
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues744624
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage13%92%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? vitejs/vite · vuejs/vue

Ask AI about vitejs/vite vs vuejs/vue

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.