vitejs/vite vs web-infra-dev/rspack
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of July 2026, vite and rspack both show healthy maintenance signals. vite was committed to today with 22+ active contributors, while rspack last saw a commit 2 months ago with 19+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
vitejs/vite
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Used by 3 trusted projects: nuxt/nuxt, withastro/astro, vitest-dev/vitest
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 43% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
web-infra-dev/rspack
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 28% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| vite | rspack | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 81,899 | 12,684 |
| Last commit | today | 2mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 717 | 173 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 2% | 33% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? vitejs/vite · web-infra-dev/rspack
Ask AI about vitejs/vite vs web-infra-dev/rspack
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.