RepoPilot

vitejs/vite vs web-infra-dev/rspack

Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, vite and rspack both show healthy maintenance signals. vite was committed to 1 week ago with 28+ active contributors, while rspack was committed to 4 weeks ago with 15+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

vitejs/vite

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Used by 3 trusted projects: nuxt/nuxt, withastro/astro, vitest-dev/vitest
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 28+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 32% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

web-infra-dev/rspack

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Last commit today
  • 15 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 24% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

viterspack
Stars82,72412,864
Last commit11d ago28d ago
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues761270
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage45%100%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeC
Cycles8
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? vitejs/vite · web-infra-dev/rspack

Ask AI about vitejs/vite vs web-infra-dev/rspack

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.