RepoPilot

vitejs/vite vs withastro/astro

Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health

As of June 2026, vite and astro both show healthy maintenance signals. vite was committed to today with 35+ active contributors, while astro was committed to today with 20+ active contributors. vite is MIT-licensed while astro is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

vitejs/vite

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Used by 3 trusted projects: nuxt/nuxt, withastro/astro, vitest-dev/vitest
  • Last commit today
  • 35+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 38% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

withastro/astro

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (Other)

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • 1 moderate-severity advisory on direct dependencies
  • In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 20 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 28% of recent commits)
  • Other licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

viteastro
Stars81,68360,575
Last committodaytoday
LicenseMITOther
Open issues744132
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage13%8%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEs0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? vitejs/vite · withastro/astro

Ask AI about vitejs/vite vs withastro/astro

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.