RepoPilot

vitessio/vitess vs yugabyte/yugabyte-db

vitessio/vitess shows stronger signals overall

As of September 2026, vitess shows healthier maintenance signals than yugabyte-db. vitess rates Healthy overall while yugabyte-db rates Mixed. vitess was committed to 2 days ago with 22+ active contributors, while yugabyte-db was committed to 2 weeks ago with 39+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

vitessio/vitess

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Scorecard: known vulnerabilities detected (scored 2/10 by OpenSSF)
  • Last commit today
  • 22+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 28% of recent commits)
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

yugabyte/yugabyte-db

Mixed

Evidence incomplete — review before adopting

MixedDependency

license evidence incomplete

MixedFork & modify

license evidence incomplete

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; license evidence incomplete

  • 3 moderate-severity advisories on direct dependencies
  • Could not verify license from the available repository evidence
  • Last commit today
  • 39+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 15% of recent commits)
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

vitessyugabyte-db
Stars21,33210,508
Last commit2d ago15d ago
LicenseApache-2.0Unknown
Open issues1,1098,355
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage91%48%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEs0 critical · 0 high · 6 moderate · 0 low
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? vitessio/vitess · yugabyte/yugabyte-db

Ask AI about vitessio/vitess vs yugabyte/yugabyte-db

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.