wasabeef/android-gpuimage vs yuliskov/smarttube
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, android-gpuimage and smarttube both show mixed maintenance signals. android-gpuimage last saw a commit 4 years ago with 14+ active contributors, while smarttube was committed to 1 week ago with 8+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
wasabeef/android-gpuimage
Stale — last commit 4y ago
last commit was 4y ago; no tests detected in the complete Git tree…
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 4y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 55% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓14 active contributors
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- •Fork & modify Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
yuliskov/smarttube
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| android-gpuimage | smarttube | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9,155 | 32,681 |
| Last commit | 4y ago | 8d ago |
| License | Unknown | MIT |
| Open issues | 347 | 698 |
| Has tests | No | ✓ |
| Has CI | No | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 28% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? wasabeef/android-gpuimage · yuliskov/smarttube
Ask AI about wasabeef/android-gpuimage vs yuliskov/smarttube
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.