winfunc/deepreasoning vs zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw
zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, zeroclaw shows healthier maintenance signals than deepreasoning. zeroclaw rates Healthy overall while deepreasoning rates Mixed. deepreasoning last saw a commit 8 months ago with 2+ active contributors, while zeroclaw last saw a commit 1 month ago with 31+ active contributors. deepreasoning is MIT-licensed while zeroclaw is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
winfunc/deepreasoning →
Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 7mo ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 56% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓31+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 32% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| deepreasoning | zeroclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,364 | 31,108 |
| Last commit | 8mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 54 | 474 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? winfunc/deepreasoning · zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw
Ask AI about winfunc/deepreasoning vs zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.