xinntao/real-esrgan vs z4nzu/hackingtool
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, real-esrgan and hackingtool both show healthy maintenance signals. real-esrgan last saw a commit 1 year ago with 11+ active contributors, while hackingtool last saw a commit 3 months ago with 10+ active contributors. real-esrgan is BSD-3-Clause-licensed while hackingtool is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
xinntao/real-esrgan →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 87% of recent commits
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
z4nzu/hackingtool →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 57% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 8w ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| real-esrgan | hackingtool | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 35,354 | 73,012 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 3mo ago |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Open issues | 640 | 100 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 3% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? xinntao/real-esrgan · z4nzu/hackingtool
Ask AI about xinntao/real-esrgan vs z4nzu/hackingtool
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.