RepoPilot

yarolegovich/discretescrollview vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, ruoyi-vue-pro shows healthier maintenance signals than discretescrollview. ruoyi-vue-pro rates Healthy overall while discretescrollview rates Concerns. discretescrollview last saw a commit 1 year ago with 4+ active contributors, while ruoyi-vue-pro last saw a commit 1 month ago with 5+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

yarolegovich/discretescrollview

Concerns

Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago

ConcernsDependency

no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…

ConcernsFork & modify

no license — can't legally use code; no CI workflows detected

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

ConcernsDeploy as-is

no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…

  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 96% of recent commits
  • No license — legally unclear to depend on
  • No CI workflows detected
  • 4 active contributors
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
  • Fork & modify ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file
  • Deploy as-is ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 5 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

discretescrollviewruoyi-vue-pro
Stars5,78237,021
Last commit1y ago1mo ago
LicenseMIT
Open issues443
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage41%32%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineConcerns signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? yarolegovich/discretescrollview · yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Ask AI about yarolegovich/discretescrollview vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.