ymcui/chinese-llama-alpaca vs z4nzu/hackingtool
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, chinese-llama-alpaca and hackingtool both show healthy maintenance signals. chinese-llama-alpaca last saw a commit 2 months ago with 6+ active contributors, while hackingtool last saw a commit 3 months ago with 10+ active contributors. chinese-llama-alpaca is Apache-2.0-licensed while hackingtool is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ymcui/chinese-llama-alpaca →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 63% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
z4nzu/hackingtool →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 57% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 8w ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| chinese-llama-alpaca | hackingtool | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 18,949 | 73,012 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 3mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 5 | 100 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 3% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? ymcui/chinese-llama-alpaca · z4nzu/hackingtool
Ask AI about ymcui/chinese-llama-alpaca vs z4nzu/hackingtool
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.