yuliskov/smarttube vs zcshou/gogogo
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, smarttube and gogogo both show mixed maintenance signals. smarttube last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors, while gogogo last saw a commit 7 months ago with 5+ active contributors. smarttube is MIT-licensed while gogogo is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
yuliskov/smarttube →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 97% of recent commits; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
zcshou/gogogo →
Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 70% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 6mo ago
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| smarttube | gogogo | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 30,059 | 10,400 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 7mo ago |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 713 | 15 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 35% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? yuliskov/smarttube · zcshou/gogogo
Ask AI about yuliskov/smarttube vs zcshou/gogogo
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.