yuliskov/smarttube vs zhenfeng13/spring-boot-projects
yuliskov/smarttube shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, smarttube shows stronger maintenance signals than spring-boot-projects. smarttube rates Mixed overall while spring-boot-projects rates Concerns. smarttube last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors, while spring-boot-projects last saw a commit 3 years ago with 1+ active contributor. smarttube is MIT-licensed while spring-boot-projects is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
yuliskov/smarttube →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 97% of recent commits; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
zhenfeng13/spring-boot-projects →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
last commit was 3y ago; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; onboard a second core maintainer
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| smarttube | spring-boot-projects | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 30,059 | 5,726 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 3y ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 713 | 2 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 33% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? yuliskov/smarttube · zhenfeng13/spring-boot-projects
Ask AI about yuliskov/smarttube vs zhenfeng13/spring-boot-projects
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.