Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

Based on the RepoPilot analysis data provided, I can only give you signals for affaan-m/ecc:

affaan-m/ecc:

• Verdict: GO — Healthy across the board
• Dependency security: 0 critical, 0 high, 0 moderate known CVEs in 20 npm dependencies
• OpenSSF Scorecard: 6.9/10
• Stars: 233,142 | Forks: 35,533
• Weakest areas: Security-Policy (0/10), SAST (0/10), Pinned-Dependencies (6/10)

The repository_data block does not include RepoPilot analysis for jquery/jquery, so I cannot make a direct comparison between the two repos on maintenance signals, dependency security, or OpenSSF Scorecard scores.

To answer your question fairly, I'd need the same authoritative signals (import graph, CVE scans, OpenSSF Scorecard) for jquery/jquery. The source code chunks shown are from jQuery, but they don't include its overall health metrics.

FOLLOW_UPS:

• What specific maintenance aspect interests you most?
• Do you want to know about affaan-m/ecc's architecture risks?
• Can you provide jQuery's RepoPilot analysis data?