Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

I can only answer questions about affaan-m/ecc or sveltejs/svelte based on the repository data provided. However, the data block contains source code snippets from sveltejs/svelte but lacks comparable maintenance metrics for affaan-m/ecc.

From what's visible in the repository_data:

affaan-m/ecc shows:

• High engagement metrics: 232,491 stars, 35,435 forks
• Strong dependency health: 0 critical/high/moderate CVEs across 20 npm dependencies
• RepoPilot verdict: "GO — Healthy across the board"
• OpenSSF Scorecard: 6.9/10

sveltejs/svelte appears in the source code snippets but lacks the summary metrics needed for a direct comparison (star count, fork count, dependency scan results, or OpenSSF score aren't provided).

To give you a meaningful comparison of activity and maintenance signals between these two repos, I'd need comparable metrics for sveltejs/svelte—things like recent commit frequency, open issues/PRs, release cadence, and dependency vulnerability status. The current data is asymmetrical.

Can you clarify if you'd like me to focus on one repo's signals, or would you like to provide additional metrics for sveltejs/svelte?

FOLLOW_UPS:

• What specific activity metrics matter most to you?
• Does affaan-m/ecc have recent release history?
• Is sveltejs/svelte's security posture documented elsewhere?