Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

Based on the RepoPilot analysis signals available:

binarywang/wxjava shows strong health signals:

• Verdict: GO — Healthy across the board (explicit signal from RepoPilot)
• 33,019 stars, 9,058 forks indicating substantial community adoption
• Active contribution guidelines documented in [CONTRIBUTING.md], with structured PR workflows referencing Git Flow and a develop branch for active development
• Multiple specialized modules (payment, open platform, mini-programs, enterprise WeChat, video accounts, public accounts) suggesting ongoing feature development

stleary/json-java shows more conservative maintenance patterns:

• Explicitly states it is "currently in the maintenance phase" [README.md:L48-L53], meaning it accepts primarily bug fixes and test improvements rather than new features
• CodeQL analysis configured with automated security checks [.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml]
• Active but narrower scope compared to wxjava

Summary: binarywang/wxjava demonstrates higher development velocity and broader feature expansion (it's in active development mode), while stleary/json-java is intentionally in maintenance mode, prioritizing stability over new features. For activity and maintenance signals, wxjava is more active; for reliability and caution, json-java's focused maintenance approach may be preferable depending on your needs.

FOLLOW_UPS:

• What modules does wxjava support besides WeChat Pay?
• How frequently are wxjava releases published?
• Does json-java accept security-related PRs?