Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

Based on the RepoPilot analysis signals provided:

binarywang/wxjava shows stronger maintenance signals:

• Verdict: GO — explicitly marked as having "Strong maintenance signals"
• High community engagement: 33,069 stars, 9,060 forks indicate substantial adoption and interest
• Published on Maven Central, suggesting active release cycles
• Has contribution guidelines [CONTRIBUTING.md:L1-L10] with detailed code standards and PR workflow

lingochamp/filedownloader shows signs of lower recent activity:

• The CHANGELOG data extends only to 2017 (latest visible: Version 1.6.8, October 2017)
• No explicit maintenance verdict provided in the RepoPilot analysis
• Older documentation and no recent release information visible

Key caveat: The RepoPilot analysis for binarywang/wxjava notes:

• Architecture grade C (50/100) with "0 files parsed" — parsing may have failed
• OpenSSF Scorecard only 4.4/10, with weakest checks in Security-Policy (0/10), SAST (0/10), and Dependency-Update-Tool (0/10)
• These are concerning signals despite the "GO" verdict

So while wxjava has better activity metrics and explicit maintenance signals, both repositories show room for improvement in security practices and code quality tooling. For filedownloader, the 2017-era changelog suggests it may be in maintenance mode rather than active development.

FOLLOW_UPS:

• What security advisories exist for these projects?
• How many open issues does each repository have?
• When was the last release for filedownloader?