Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

Based on the RepoPilot analysis signals:

binarywang/wxjava has stronger maintenance indicators:

• Verdict: GO — explicitly rated as having "Strong maintenance signals"
• 33,069 stars and 9,060 forks — substantial community engagement
• Published on Maven Central — indicates active releases and distribution
• Code contributions guidelines documented in [CONTRIBUTING.md:L1-L10] and [AGENTS.md:L32-L40], showing organized development processes
• Multiple Solon plugin configurations actively maintained across different modules (WxMa, WxCp, WxChannel)

pqpo/smartcropper shows mixed signals:

• Lower activity indicators based on the README content
• The README explicitly mentions a newer project focus: "推荐一下我的最新开源项目：[Pragma]" (recommending a newer open-source project)
• Author notes seeking collaboration: "目前优化了一套更高识别率的模型和算法，有意向合作的请联系邮箱" — suggests maintenance may be intermittent
• Last documented version is v2.1.3

Conclusion: binarywang/wxjava demonstrates significantly better maintenance activity with formal contribution processes, broader integration (Solon plugins, Maven Central distribution), and ongoing development. pqpo/smartcropper appears to have transitioned to lower priority status in favor of the author's newer projects.

FOLLOW_UPS:

• What is wxjava's current version and release frequency?
• How many open issues or PRs does binarywang/wxjava have?
• When was pqpo/smartcropper last updated?