Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

Based on the repository data provided, I can compare some basic signals:

**dromara/sa-token:[REDACTED]

• 18,983 stars, 2,915 forks
• Current version: v1.45.0 (shown in README)
• Described as an active, comprehensive Java authentication framework with five core modules

knowm/xchange:

• Repository data doesn't include star/fork counts
• Has CI/CD setup (GitHub Actions Maven workflow shown)
• Active documentation structure with Wiki pages

However, the repository_data block doesn't include detailed maintenance signals like:

• Recent commit frequency or dates
• Issue/PR activity and response times
• Release cadence and recency
• Contributor activity trends
• Dependency update status

The RepoPilot analysis section (which would contain "import graph, cycles, architecture grade, published dependency advisories, and OpenSSF project-practice signals") is absent from the data provided.

To make a confident assessment, I would need:

1. Commit history timestamps and frequency
2. Recent release dates
3. Open/closed issue ratios
4. Dependency advisory reports
5. Last-updated timestamps

From the visible data alone, dromara/sa-token shows stronger community adoption (nearly 19k stars), but this alone doesn't indicate maintenance quality. Both projects have documentation, but maintenance signals require timing and activity data not present in the current repository_data.

FOLLOW_UPS:

• What are the recent commit timestamps for each repo?
• How many open vs. closed issues exist currently?
• When were the latest releases published?