Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

I don't have enough data to make a reliable comparison of activity and maintenance signals between the two repositories based on what's available.

Here's what I can observe from the repository_data:

facebook/react-native:

• 126,346 stars, 25,214 forks — substantial community adoption
• The repository data includes extensive feature flag infrastructure documentation and modern JavaScript/TypeScript patterns, suggesting active development
• However, I lack recent commit history, issue velocity, or maintainer response times

mozilla/deepspeech:

• The repository data shows bibliography entries and utility scripts, but no star/fork counts are provided
• The data includes CI configuration and import scripts, but lacks explicit activity metrics
• The issue template is present, but I don't have visibility into actual issue resolution rates

To properly assess maintenance health, I would need:

• Recent commit timestamps and frequency
• Issue/PR response times and closure rates
• Release cadence and version bump patterns
• Contributor activity trends

The RepoPilot analysis signals mentioned in my instructions (import graph, dependency advisories, OpenSSF signals) are not present in the retrieved data for either repository.

Based solely on public profile metrics, facebook/react-native shows stronger documented adoption (126K+ stars), but that alone doesn't guarantee superior maintenance. For a definitive comparison, you'd want to check the GitHub "Insights" tab for both repos to see recent activity graphs and contributor trends.

FOLLOW_UPS:

• When was the last commit to each repository?
• How many open issues and PRs does each have?
• Who are the active maintainers in each project?