RepoPilot

Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

About facebookexperimental/recoil · 2 messages · last activity 8/16/2026

Question

Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

RepoPilot

I don't have specific maintenance activity signals in the repository data provided. However, I can note what's visible:

facebookexperimental/recoil:

  • 19,440 stars, 1,210 forks
  • Has a documented CONTRIBUTING process [CONTRIBUTING.md:L14-L24] requiring PRs to pass tests, linting, and formatting via yarn format
  • Multiple maintained packages (Recoil, Recoil Sync, Refine) with separate CHANGELOGs
  • Latest changelog entry shown is 0.7.2 from 2022-04-13 [CHANGELOG-recoil.md:L37-L41]

lodash/lodash:

  • Repository data shows CodeQL workflow setup [.github/workflows/codeql.yml:L1-L40] with automated security analysis
  • Perf benchmark files [perf/perf.js] and extensive documentation [doc/README.md] suggesting active maintenance infrastructure
  • No recent version info in the provided data

The repository data doesn't include RepoPilot analysis signals (import graphs, dependency advisories, recent commit activity, or open issue counts) that would definitively answer which has better current maintenance. To properly assess activity and maintenance signals, I'd need:

  • Recent commit history
  • Open issue/PR counts and resolution rates
  • Current version release dates
  • Dependency vulnerability reports

FOLLOW_UPS:

  • What's the most recent version release for each?
  • How many open issues does each project have?
  • What's the commit frequency in the last 6 months?

Want to ask your own question?

Open chat for facebookexperimental/recoil

Public Q&A. Generated by RepoPilot from the actual source of facebookexperimental/recoil. AI answers can be incomplete or stale — verify before relying on them.